CAS is a piracy platform that monitors for internet users who even “casually” pirate material, while punishing those users for their infringements.
The five participating ISPs to initially enroll in CAS include: AT&T, Cablevision, Comcast, Time Warner, and Verizon.
Comcast will be the first to launch the program on Monday with the other ISPs rolling out the privacy breaching software throughout the week. While ISPs and government officials have called the Copyright Alert System nothing more than an “educational” service, critics have attack it for being a corporate interest platform meant to stifle internet advances.
An ISP is not required to cut off internet access completely to infringing parties (a practice observed in New Zealand and France), however they will punish users. For example, Comcast could limit a users internet speeds upon a single infraction. By cutting down internet speeds ISPs save on data infrastructure costs while punishing users. Infringing parties could also be forced to read materials and watch videos before their internet access to fully restored.
In the most troubling sign for the program, the system’s executive director has promised to hire an outside consultant to monitor the system and examine how it flags content. The outside auditor has not been hired at this time, raising huge concerns over the programs reach and flexibility.
The Copyright Alert System has been marred by repeated internal conflicts which initially pushed its launch from November to the end of February.
Read more at http://www.inquisitr.com/541407/copyright-alert-system-launches-monday-will-punish-internet-piracy-with-no-initial-oversight/#XGJKXSKKpqVmbAJ7.99
The five participating ISPs to initially enroll in CAS include: AT&T, Cablevision, Comcast, Time Warner, and Verizon.
Comcast will be the first to launch the program on Monday with the other ISPs rolling out the privacy breaching software throughout the week. While ISPs and government officials have called the Copyright Alert System nothing more than an “educational” service, critics have attack it for being a corporate interest platform meant to stifle internet advances.
An ISP is not required to cut off internet access completely to infringing parties (a practice observed in New Zealand and France), however they will punish users. For example, Comcast could limit a users internet speeds upon a single infraction. By cutting down internet speeds ISPs save on data infrastructure costs while punishing users. Infringing parties could also be forced to read materials and watch videos before their internet access to fully restored.
In the most troubling sign for the program, the system’s executive director has promised to hire an outside consultant to monitor the system and examine how it flags content. The outside auditor has not been hired at this time, raising huge concerns over the programs reach and flexibility.
The Copyright Alert System has been marred by repeated internal conflicts which initially pushed its launch from November to the end of February.
Read more at http://www.inquisitr.com/541407/copyright-alert-system-launches-monday-will-punish-internet-piracy-with-no-initial-oversight/#XGJKXSKKpqVmbAJ7.99