Jul. 6th, 2013

“I’ve been thinking a lot about sex and teenage girls this week.
It’s hard not to when the press have been so gleefully and salaciously reporting on all the details of the Jeremy Forrest abduction case. When the new Children’s Laureate, Malorie Blackman, has had the same papers clutching their collective pearls, at her suggestion that there needs to be more sex in YA novels, to offset the damaging messages teenagers are receiving from the prevalence of porn online.

Talking of which, there was also the Robin Thicke video for his number one single, Blurred Lines, which features three fully clothed man, several nude girls cavorting with children’s toys, having their hair brushed, smoke blown in their faces and told “I’ll give you something big enough to tear your ass in two”.

Meanwhile Jinan Younis, a seventeen year old girl who started a feminist society at her school in response to how she saw her friends suffering as a direct result of their gender was met with responses like “feminism doesn’t mean they don’t like the D, they just haven’t found one to satisfy them yet,” from her male classmates.

So, is it any wonder that I can’t stop thinking about sex and teenage girls?

The teenage girl is not a one-size-fits-all entity. When I was fifteen, the girls in my class were busy dealing with their newfound sexuality in different ways. Half of them channelled all these new feelings that they weren’t sure what to do with into fancying some fairly innocuous boybander. I love that there is no power mightier than thousands of girls screaming their heads off at the 02 or Manchester arenas.

Then there were the other fifteen year old girls who all dated men in their twenties because they had money and their own cars. By and large, they didn’t seem unduly threatened by having a relationship with someone older than them. On the contrary, they got off on the social cachet and would callously dump their twenty something boyfriends on a whim. Besides, have you ever spent time with a fifteen year old boy? You have? Then you’d understand why no self-respecting fifteen year old girl would want to go out with one of them. But this is why we have the age of consent to protect all the different types of teenage girls, from the shy ones who write Mrs Harry Styles on their pencil cases to the ones who seem worldly and sophisticated because they date older men, but who you wouldn’t trust to do their homework unsupervised.

When I was fifteen, I vacillated between the two camps. Most of the passion and yearning that turned me inside out on an hourly basis was directed at Morrissey from The Smiths and writing him heartfelt letters when I should have been doing GCSE coursework. But there were other times when I was made painfully aware that I existed in this strange hinterland of not quite a girl, not yet a woman but I didn’t have Britney Spears to articulate that for me.

I had the awkward fumbles at parties that are a teen rite of passage and which left me wondering what all the fuss was about. But there was also the time when I was trying on a dress in a very cool London boutique on a quiet morning when I was bunking off school. All of a sudden the changing room curtain was pulled back by the male shop assistant. Stuff happened, partly because I was curious and partly because I was suddenly in this strange situation that I didn’t have the experience or the maturity to extricate myself from. Afterwards, he let me have the dress for free and I remember walking out of the shop feeling more powerful than I think I’ve ever done in my life. It didn’t fuck me up. It didn’t ruin me. For a week or two, it lifted me up from being an overweight, self-loathing fifteen year old.

But there was another encounter with a friend’s dad in a bathroom that filled me with dread and revulsion. There were times I was flashed at. Times I was told that I might be worth a go once I was legal. Times I was groped and mauled on crowded tube trains, while I was in my school uniform. And those incidents did fuck me up and made me feel that I wasn’t in charge of my own body or what happened to it.

All this was in a time before the internet. Before Facebook. Before selfies. Before the pressure on teenage girls to look sexy without daring to be sexually active, because then you’re a slag and a slut and asking for it, was at the epidemic proportions that it is now.

Also, it was a time when the teen mag ruled supreme. We might not have had Twitter, but we had Just Seventeen. We were armed with information and knowledge. Told time and time again “to be safe, to be sussed, but sex under sixteen is illegal”.

By the time I was working on Just Seventeen in the late 90s, the amount of information and knowledge we could arm our readers with was constantly under threat. I used to hate going into work on the days that a backbench Tory MP desperate for some column inches would rail against the hot bed of vice and iniquity that were teen mags, while making it clear that they’d never actually picked up a teen mag and read it. In between fake ads for Leonardo DiCaprio commemorative plates and perfectly innocent articles on what to do to make your crush notice you, we still had problem pages, we still had articles on sexual health, we still ran real life pieces on relationships and told our readers that “to be sussed was a must but sex under sixteen is illegal”. It was very obvious to me that the main problem the Tory MPs had was our acknowledgement that teenage girls could be sexual beings and that they needed advice and support on dealing with that.

I used to sit on TMAP, the Teenage Magazine Advisory Panel, with other teen mag representatives and some genuinely well intentioned do-gooders and try to explain to them that the Department Of Health ran ads targetting our readers to inform them about sexual health issues in our magazine that we couldn’t run as editorial because the government would try to shut us down.

But now the internet and mobile phones have killed off teen magazines. What they haven’t killed off the need for teenagers to have somewhere to go to get frank, impartial information about everything from their boobs to fancying their best friends to whether they can get pregnant if they do it standing up. The internet is a big, unregulated place where it’s impossible to filter information – which is why a lot of sex education now comes from porn films – so teenagers think that pubic hair is an abomination, blow jobs are mandatory and if you’re not having multiple orgasms then you’re a freak of nature.

In the wider world, from RnB videos to the Daily Mail sidebar of shame to University Facebook pages set up to discuss how rape-able the female student body is, teenagers, boys and girls, are taught that women’s bodies are objects to be pored over, discussed, criticised, used, discarded, belittled. And I’m not going to apologise for coming across as all second wave feminism here. We are sliding dangerously back to a place that I never thought we’d get to, not after all our Take Back The Night marches and riot grrrl fanzines.

I cannot imagine a worse time to be a teenage girl. When eating disorders and self-harming are at an all-time high. When girls are under pressure to send sexy pics of themselves to their male classmates or risk being labelled frigid and tight. And when if you are raped or sexually assaulted, it was probably your fault for drinking or going for a walk with a couple of boys or wearing a short skirt. The onus is still on girls to protect themselves because boys and men are unable to prevent themselves from doing what comes naturally when confronted by the mind-melding power of a female body. It would be much simpler to send out one clear message: don’t rape people.

So, I think teenage girls are getting their rawest deal and this is why I’m so passionate and committed to writing YA novels. My characters have sex. Big whoop. They have awkward, messy teenage sex that causes awkward, messy feelings. They talk about sex. They learn that sex has emotional consequences, good and bad. And sometimes they have sex just because it feels really nice.

That to me is a healthy, important message for my readers. I doubt very much that reading one of my novels has ever forced a teenage girl to go out and have sex but I absolutely know for certain that when they did finally get round to going out and having sex, what they’d read in my novels helped a little bit. And yes, I’ve had reviewers describe the sex in my last YA novel, Adorkable as “gross” and “nasty”. But the gross comment came from a thirteen year old girl and if she thinks sex is gross then I’m happy about that as she isn’t going to be having it anytime soon. The “nasty’ came from a woman in America and says more about her attitude to sex, than it does to my decision to write about two teenagers above the age of consent establishing clear boundaries before they got down to it.

There’s a lot of reactionary nonsense talked about sex in YA novels, but I’m far more worried about the teenagers who don’t read books and what they’re getting up to than the ones who are.

So, what I wish teenage girls knew is that their value and worth isn’t intrinsically tied in to how they look, That’s it’s all right to want to have sex. It’s all right if they don’t want to. But both camps should know how to put on a condom and why getting vaccinated against HPV is non-negotiable. Wider society should be there to provide advice and support and to give teenage girls the space and freedom to realise that their sexuality doesn’t belong to anyone else. It’s their own to do with what they will, at a time that’s right for them.”

— Sarra Manning, "Sex and the Teenage Girl”
A study published in the journal Pediatrics shows that injuries to children associated with inflatable bounce houses has risen dramatically over the past fifteen years. According to researchers, bouncy castle-related injuries that were treated in U.S. emergency departments increased 15-fold from 2005 to 2010. In 2010, more than 30 children per day (one every 45 minutes) were treated for bouncy castle injuries.

The majority of the injuries, 43%, were caused by falls. 28% of the injuries were broken bones, and 27% were strains or sprains. However, 19% of the injuries were to the head and neck. The study’s authors say this demonstrates the danger of bouncy castles.

Smith and his colleagues point out that the injury pattern for bouncy castles is similar to that of trampolines, which already have national safety guidelines.
(whereas bouncy castles/houses do not)

The study’s authors suggest that parents consider the risks of bouncy castles before allowing their children to use them. If parents do allow their children to use bouncy castles, the recommendation is that only children 6 years and older be allowed on them, one at a time, and that an adult be present for supervision. Also, if more than one child is to be allowed on such an apparatus, the authors suggest that the children be of approximately the same age and size.

Along with kicking injuries, if the castles are not properly tethered, they have been known to tip and blow away with children inside.

I very much agree with the one child at a time rule, particularly girls, as over the years I've heard numerous first-hand stories of friends who were assaulted in bouncy castles/houses because if people hear shrieking, they assume it's only children playing.
otherwise known as ‘screw the pooch’ - I have NO IDEA why this ever passed the idea stage, much less got made into an episode of SPN. And let’s break down Mans Best Friend With Benefits.

Premise of story, female familiar (who can change from a woman to a dog) decides to become the servant of a male witch. She wears a bright red dogcollar with studs through the entire episode, even when the other familiars (in particular the other featured male familiar) do not - add to this the familiar is a black woman and the witch a white man.

I suspect that this ‘love story’ was supposed to evoke the bigotry of the miscegenation laws in the US, we are supposed to root for this couple because their love is taboo - a romantic sexual relationship between familiars and witches are not allowed in the magic world. This is never explained, but common sense would dictate, in a case where the familiar gives over their lives in service to a master (and she calls him master) there are consent issues.

We are supposed to see the woman as empowered throughout this nonsense, because she ‘chooses’ to be a slave, she wears a collar with pride - she even mounts her Master during sexual intercourse - however during the interlude the witch is chained down by Sam and Dean Winchester, (no kidding) which negates whatever power this was supposed to signify.

When the couple is forced by their community to face the consequences of their relationship, the witch decides to push the familiar away (for her own good) while he goes to confront the enemy alone, reinforcing that he has all the power in the relationship.

When she goes to his rescue - in loyal obedient dog form - implying that her real power is as a animal, not a woman, we hear the Winchesters (who throughout the story are mere bystanders) make the shocking revelation that they find this doglike devotion sexually arousing. Honestly, if I didn’t adore this show for years, I would have stopped watching the series right there.

At the end the familiar and her master are run out of town after defeating the enemy (another white man) who as well as being appalled they were breaking cultural taboos, wanted the woman as his slave.

The couple say goodbye to Sam and Dean to remake their lives, let me add here that the familiar grew up in the witch community, the male witch ‘adopted’ it as a lifestyle, the familiar must leave her entire community, friends and family, whereas the man loses a career, but it is implied that he’ll do fine wherever he goes.

A bit at the end had Dean saying ‘he likes dogs’ while the woman responds ‘no you don’t’ and I wondered, what is it that Dean isn’t supposed to like, a black woman (Cassie negates this) a magical creature? I’d hope that as part of Team Free Will Dean will never understand a person choosing to make themselves a slave.

Often when I see a story that goes awry, I consider how it could have been made better, simple fixes would have been, the woman choosing to remove her collar at any point, the couple fighting their foe together, the familiar having the animal form of say, a cat which implies independence, rather than a dog, which implies unconditional devotion, (nothing against dogs) and I don’t suppose I need to remind anyone of the connotation of fierce females as ‘bitches’ but it’s not empowering in this case - but then they couldn’t have used the snarky title.

This was all about ‘titilation’ of the worse sort, it’s lighthanded method of (not) addressing the issues it brought up - of consent, sexism, bigotry, slavery in the US, retcons to the spn canon of witchcraft being a result of demon deals - and let’s not forget bestiality! - made this a perfect storm of wretchedness,

When Dean is flustered considering the couple’s sex life it was the only part of the abysmal episode I could relate to. Now, I might try to erase this episode from my memory, but it’s still there, and the fact this got the greenlight made me despair of the showrunning season eight.

Word and Image

Jul. 6th, 2013 10:55 pm
karadinart: (supernatural icon by karadin)


How does it feel
To treat me like you do
When you’ve laid laid your hands upon me
And told me who you are

I thought I was mistaken
I thought I heard your words
Tell me how do I feel
Tell me now how do I feel

Those who came before me
Lived through their vocations
From the past until completion
They will turn away no more

And I still find it so hard
To say what I need to say
But I’m quite sure that you’ll tell me
Just how I should feel today

I see a ship in the harbor
I can and shall obey
But if it wasn’t for your misfortunes
I’d be a heavenly person today

And I thought I was mistaken
And I thought I heard you speak
Tell me how do I feel
Tell me now how should I feel

Now I stand here waiting

I thought I told you to leave me
While I walked down to the beach
Tell me how does it feel
When your heart grows cold


New Order

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags

Style Credit