(no subject)

Date: 2011-10-11 05:22 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sirona-gs.livejournal.com
#fail

#somuchfail

(no subject)

Date: 2011-10-11 05:56 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] karadin.livejournal.com
*sigh*

(no subject)

Date: 2011-10-11 06:35 pm (UTC)
ext_9747: Zack Fair as a puppy, holding a frisbee in his mouth. (Default)
From: [identity profile] ardwynna-m.livejournal.com
Biblical literalists are such a strange breed.

(no subject)

Date: 2011-10-11 08:27 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mercurella.livejournal.com
*LOL* Funnily enough, I have actually yet to meet a Christian who believes in the literal creation of the universe. The traditional Catholics/Orthodox and Episcopals are pretty much pro-evolution (with God in charge or course, kind of lit the touchpaper kind of deal on the big bang).....so where did all this literal "sola scriptura" creationist stuff come from, except from someone's much LATER interpretation of the texts? Still haven't had a single answer from an Intelligent Design/Creationist believer that expands beyond "because the bible says so" argument that covers at least 100% of their arguments.

(no subject)

Date: 2011-10-11 09:19 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] margi-lynn.livejournal.com
I hadn't realized that biblical literalists had gotten to the point of saying, oh this science that we base nuclear power on, and have seen and touched and know how it works, that's not real at all! Because it ~~sounds weird to me personally~~.

(no subject)

Date: 2011-10-12 01:35 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] karadin.livejournal.com
you and me both.

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags

Style Credit