This site makes it easy to repost anything on the internet, and it's not concerned with infringement, because it puts the onus on the copyright owner to a)find the content b) file a complaint, but you need to supply every single url the image appears on their site. Case in point, I find a pic of my kids copied 8 times, yet everytime I follow that link, people have copied from that, so I have to keep following the thread. And often by the time I put in say, ten urls the site times out, so I have to do it all over again.

This is unlike, most sites, like say, tumblr, where you can report a reposting once, and they take down all the reblogs from the source - if you are the owner of the copyright.

(no subject)

Date: 2012-07-29 07:24 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] unwritten-icons.livejournal.com
That's awful. Makes me wonder about my stuff, now. I don't mind if people post my icons and such to other sites - it's just a 100x100 square - but as for my art, that's another story.

(no subject)

Date: 2012-08-02 07:22 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kayay.livejournal.com
I'm not keen on Pinterest either. Some argue it gives "exposure" to the creators, but when I did a quick keyword search of comics I noticed:

* A majority had no linkback to the original source, just some unidentifiable URL
* Those images in which the creator included their url on the image did help, but some familiar comics had the url removed at some point in the sharing
* The share chain tends to, by nature, lead to the original source being lost, and rarely with the Pinterest poster bother to try and track it down. It's like a game of Telephone.

A good post to read is: http://ddkportraits.com/2012/02/why-i-tearfully-deleted-my-pinterest-inspiration-boards/

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags

Style Credit